[已解决问题] 翻译,急要!
1.there is more agreement on the kibd of behavior referred by the term "intelligence" than there is on how to interpret or classify them
2.It is not supposed to ----it was not designed for such purposes.
3.Now since the assessment of intelligence is a comparative matter we must be sure that the scale with which we are comparing our subjects provides a “valid” or “fair” comparison.
4.because he wants us to "follow the crowd" in masses, he directs his appeal to groups held together by common ties of nationality, religion, race, environment, sex, vocation. thus progagandists campaigning for or against a program will appeal to us as Catholics, Protestants, or Jews; as members of the Nordic race or as Negroes; as farmers or as school teachers; as housewives or as miners.
2.It is not supposed to ----it was not designed for such purposes.
3.Now since the assessment of intelligence is a comparative matter we must be sure that the scale with which we are comparing our subjects provides a “valid” or “fair” comparison.
4.because he wants us to "follow the crowd" in masses, he directs his appeal to groups held together by common ties of nationality, religion, race, environment, sex, vocation. thus progagandists campaigning for or against a program will appeal to us as Catholics, Protestants, or Jews; as members of the Nordic race or as Negroes; as farmers or as school teachers; as housewives or as miners.
最佳答案
1.大家对于智力所体现的行为方式有更多的共识,而对如何解释和归类这些行为意见不一.
2. 它现在不应该是----从前也不是为着这样的目的而设计的.
3. 既然智力的评估是一个相对的事情,我们必须确信我们用来比较事物的天平进行的是有效而且公平的比较.
4.因为他希望我们在群体中"从众",他把他的请求通过民族、宗教、种族、环境、性别和职业的共同连系指向集体，于是支持或反对某个计划的宣传者会请求我们，无论我们是天主教徒、新教徒或犹太教徒；游牧民族成员或黑人；农民或学校教师；家庭主妇或矿工（我们都由于一种共同性而听从他的请求）。
提问者对于答案的评价：虽然跟答案有点出入,但是你还是很强了,谢谢
2. 它现在不应该是----从前也不是为着这样的目的而设计的.
3. 既然智力的评估是一个相对的事情,我们必须确信我们用来比较事物的天平进行的是有效而且公平的比较.
4.因为他希望我们在群体中"从众",他把他的请求通过民族、宗教、种族、环境、性别和职业的共同连系指向集体，于是支持或反对某个计划的宣传者会请求我们，无论我们是天主教徒、新教徒或犹太教徒；游牧民族成员或黑人；农民或学校教师；家庭主妇或矿工（我们都由于一种共同性而听从他的请求）。
2007-5-22 22:43:25
回答者：xizili
提问者对于答案的评价：虽然跟答案有点出入,但是你还是很强了,谢谢
其它回答(1)
|
1里面的kibd是什么，是输入错误么？ 2.原本不应该是这样的——它不是因为这个用处而设计出来的。 3.因为对于智商的评价是需要作出比较的，所以我们必须确定我们是否以合理而公平的尺度来进行比较。 |
相关问题
评论