[已解决问题] 这句话是什么意思
On Aug. 14 a computer hacker named Virgil Griffith unleashed a clever little program onto the Internet that he dubbed WikiScanner. It's a simple application that trolls through the records of Wikipedia, the publicly editable Web-based encyclopedia, and checks on who is making changes to which entries. >>>>>>>Sometimes it's people who shouldn't be. <<<<<
Sometimes it's people who shouldn't be.
这句话是什么意思,???
问题补充： (接上文)Sometimes it's people who shouldn't be. For example, WikiScanner turned up evidence that somebody from Wal-Mart had punched up Wal-Mart's Wikipedia entry. Bad retail giant.
Sometimes it's people who shouldn't be.
这句话是什么意思,???
问题补充： (接上文)Sometimes it's people who shouldn't be. For example, WikiScanner turned up evidence that somebody from Wal-Mart had punched up Wal-Mart's Wikipedia entry. Bad retail giant.
最佳答案
I will try to explain in English:
WikiScanner can track who is making changes to Wikipedia entries, and sometimes we find out that those people who are editing/changing the entries should not be doing that. Because there might be a conflict of interest. The example is that "Walmart had been changing the Wal-mart's wikipedia entries", and as a result making the entries objective, and even biased.
If we try again...
On Aug. 14 a computer hacker named Virgil Griffith unleashed a clever little program onto the Internet that he dubbed WikiScanner. It's a simple application that trolls through the records of Wikipedia, the publicly editable Web-based encyclopedia, and checks on who is making changes to which entries. Sometimes it's {those} people who shouldn't be {making changes to the entries}. For example, WikiScanner turned up evidence that somebody from Wal-Mart had punched up Wal-Mart's Wikipedia entry. Bad retail giant.
Hope this clears things up a bit.
提问者对于答案的评价：yes , this clears things up a bit. but not absolutely
WikiScanner can track who is making changes to Wikipedia entries, and sometimes we find out that those people who are editing/changing the entries should not be doing that. Because there might be a conflict of interest. The example is that "Walmart had been changing the Wal-mart's wikipedia entries", and as a result making the entries objective, and even biased.
If we try again...
On Aug. 14 a computer hacker named Virgil Griffith unleashed a clever little program onto the Internet that he dubbed WikiScanner. It's a simple application that trolls through the records of Wikipedia, the publicly editable Web-based encyclopedia, and checks on who is making changes to which entries. Sometimes it's {those} people who shouldn't be {making changes to the entries}. For example, WikiScanner turned up evidence that somebody from Wal-Mart had punched up Wal-Mart's Wikipedia entry. Bad retail giant.
Hope this clears things up a bit.
2007-8-27 21:10:31
回答者：llcede
提问者对于答案的评价：yes , this clears things up a bit. but not absolutely
其它回答(4)
|
有时，人们不应该这么做。 感觉不对了，没头没脑的冒出这么一句话。。。我觉得好像不要中间这句话，上下文也可以读通啊。。。 一个名叫维吉尔•格里菲特的电脑黑客在因特网上放了一个聪明的小程序，他将它称作WikiScanner。这是一个简单的应用程序，可以收集维基记录并且可以查出谁在修改哪一个条目。 有时，那些修改是不正确的。比如，WikiScanner查出沃尔玛的某个人曾经修改过沃尔玛的维基条目而故意败坏沃尔玛。 这段文章来自于8.25的《Time》杂志 有时，人们不应该这么做。 感觉不对了，没头没脑的冒出这么一句话。。。我觉得好像不要中间这句话，上下文也可以读通啊。。。 一个名叫维吉尔•格里菲特的电脑黑客在因特网上放了一个聪明的小程序，他将它称作WikiScanner。这是一个简单的应用程序，可以收集维基记录并且可以查出谁在修改哪一个条目。 有时，那些修改是不正确的。比如，WikiScanner查出沃尔玛的某个人曾经修改过沃尔玛的维基条目而故意败坏沃尔玛。 |
相关问题
评论